Guitar | Bass | Keyboard | Microphones | Mixers | Audio Interfaces | Sequencers & Software Plugins | Live Sound & PA | Drums | Club & DJ | Accessories | Blowouts

Dynamic or condensor?

If you couldn't find anywhere better to post. post your question about mics here

Moderator: Tweak

Dynamic or condensor?

Postby torbinsh on Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:31 am

I am surprised to hear that pros like you are recommending dynamic over condensor.

Is it really the best choice to record vocals in a studio? is it the best choice for a loud, deep, bassy male voice (rock)?

If yes, which model would you choose? Your number one choice dynamic and number one condensor for my type of voice?

Thanks,
Tor
User avatar
torbinsh
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:16 am

Re: Dynamic or condensor?

Postby mwynwood on Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:57 am

torbinsh wrote:I am surprised to hear that pros like you are recommending dynamic over condensor.

Why is that surprising?
User avatar
mwynwood
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:36 pm
Location: Australia

Postby MASSIVE Mastering on Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:32 am

I think this was supposed to be a reply to another thread.

In any case, dynamics are used more than anyone can tell you everywhere except in the magazines that tout $100 LDC's as "vocal microphones."

Sure, it depends on the voice, it depends on the application, etc., etc.

As a rule of thumb: If I want to pick up the vocalist exactly "as is" (which when it really comes down to it, is a rather rare occasion), then I'll probably reach for a condenser. "As is" meaning every flaw, every bit of air, every room flaw, every lip smack, every bit of sibilance, every minor angle change, etc., etc., etc.

If I want something that will flatter the voice in front of it and be much less "picky" about it while giving me extreme flexibility and reactivity to processing during the mix, I'll reach for a LDD.

Without question, 9 times out of 10 (maybe more), it's a LDD.

If Celine Dion walked in, it'd probably be a condenser.
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC
Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.), IL - USA


New freakishly inexpensive rate options -- My BLOG -- GEAR -- PHOTOS --

Image Image
User avatar
MASSIVE Mastering
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago area, IL, USA

Postby tbuenger on Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:51 am

What would you use if Cher walked in your studio? :lol:
User avatar
tbuenger
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Eclectic Alabama - south of Birmingham

Postby doogiehowser on Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:33 am

lol @ tbuenger.

great post by the way. i'm starting to understand more why Massive favors dynamic mics over condensors.
User avatar
doogiehowser
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:30 am

Re: Dynamic or condensor?

Postby jandrodavalos on Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:37 am

torbinsh wrote:If yes, which model would you choose? Your number one choice dynamic and number one condensor for my type of voice?

do a search,also this has been talked about many times here is one
http://studio-central.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=60046
a new, fancy shmancy mic will just sound *slightly* better through the same old poo-pre.
GEARLIST
http://studio-central.com/phpbb/viewtop ... 840#393840
User avatar
jandrodavalos
Member
Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Tucson Az

Re: Dynamic or condensor?

Postby EricF on Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:06 pm

torbinsh wrote:is it the best choice for a loud, deep, bassy male voice (rock)?

If yes, which model would you choose?


A dynamic was good enough for James Hetfield to nearly swallow - that's a loud rock voice. His choice: Shure SM7
"Blues ain't nothin' more than a good man feeling down." - Blind Dog Fulton

My Music---My Room---My Gear---DIY Acoustic Treatment
User avatar
EricF
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 1466
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Altadena, CA

Re: Dynamic or condensor?

Postby tbuenger on Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:23 pm

EricF wrote:
torbinsh wrote:is it the best choice for a loud, deep, bassy male voice (rock)?

If yes, which model would you choose?


A dynamic was good enough for James Hetfield to nearly swallow - that's a loud rock voice. His choice: Shure SM7


That would probably be testimonial enough for me!
User avatar
tbuenger
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Eclectic Alabama - south of Birmingham

Re: Dynamic or condensor?

Postby MASSIVE Mastering on Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:51 pm

EricF wrote:
torbinsh wrote:is it the best choice for a loud, deep, bassy male voice (rock)?

If yes, which model would you choose?


A dynamic was good enough for James Hetfield to nearly swallow - that's a loud rock voice. His choice: Shure SM7

A SM7b with no screen, halfway down his throat, with NO tweaking (Bob thought it was just a scratch vocal track and treated it as such).

And you might notice that sonically, it's the only thing on the latest album that actually sounds well-recorded. :lol:
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC
Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.), IL - USA


New freakishly inexpensive rate options -- My BLOG -- GEAR -- PHOTOS --

Image Image
User avatar
MASSIVE Mastering
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago area, IL, USA

Re: Dynamic or condensor?

Postby tbuenger on Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:02 pm

MASSIVE Mastering wrote:
EricF wrote:
torbinsh wrote:is it the best choice for a loud, deep, bassy male voice (rock)?

If yes, which model would you choose?


A dynamic was good enough for James Hetfield to nearly swallow - that's a loud rock voice. His choice: Shure SM7

A SM7b with no screen, halfway down his throat, with NO tweaking (Bob thought it was just a scratch vocal track and treated it as such).

And you might notice that sonically, it's the only thing on the latest album that actually sounds well-recorded. :lol:


This brings up a good point. I know there was a thread somewhere on this forum not too long ago that discussed "the best recordings" over the past years.

Seems like it would be beneficial to have a topic that discusses recordings of past and current songs, good and bad. Why? We're always taught to have a collection of reference CDs around to compare our work to. Understanding what makes "your favorite songs" tick can be helpful throughout the overall audio engineering process. Alot of songs today sound really squashed; ala the new Lifehouse song.
Sorry to ramble on here. I'll PM Tweak. :(
User avatar
tbuenger
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Eclectic Alabama - south of Birmingham

Postby shaaregeulah on Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:20 pm

tbuenger wrote:What would you use if Cher walked in your studio? :lol:


Autotune!
User avatar
shaaregeulah
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: NYC

Postby MASSIVE Mastering on Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:42 pm

tbuenger wrote:What would you use if Cher walked in your studio? :lol:

Holy water. And if that didn't work, garlic or a wooden stake, before calling the authorities.


And yeah, Autotune I guess... :x
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC
Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.), IL - USA


New freakishly inexpensive rate options -- My BLOG -- GEAR -- PHOTOS --

Image Image
User avatar
MASSIVE Mastering
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago area, IL, USA

Postby tbuenger on Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:57 pm

Autotune is the technically correct answer!
Holy Water is the philosophically correct answer!

Anyway good discussion. There does seem to be a belief, especially among clients, that condensors are for the studio and dynamics are for the live shows.
User avatar
tbuenger
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Eclectic Alabama - south of Birmingham

Postby jandrodavalos on Mon May 12, 2008 3:44 am

hey everyone just want to let you know that I sold my tlm 103 and I just purchased the sm7b..It should be here tomorrow, i cant wait to try it out.
a new, fancy shmancy mic will just sound *slightly* better through the same old poo-pre.
GEARLIST
http://studio-central.com/phpbb/viewtop ... 840#393840
User avatar
jandrodavalos
Member
Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Tucson Az

Postby tbuenger on Mon May 12, 2008 7:55 am

jandrodavalos wrote:hey everyone just want to let you know that I sold my tlm 103 and I just purchased the sm7b..It should be here tomorrow, i cant wait to try it out.


You won't regret it!
User avatar
tbuenger
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Eclectic Alabama - south of Birmingham

Postby P.T. on Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 am

SM7b.

Is the preamp as critical for this as it is for the SM57?
User avatar
P.T.
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:08 am

Postby jandrodavalos on Mon May 12, 2008 11:32 am

if critical means are all dynamics gain hungry then yes..
a new, fancy shmancy mic will just sound *slightly* better through the same old poo-pre.
GEARLIST
http://studio-central.com/phpbb/viewtop ... 840#393840
User avatar
jandrodavalos
Member
Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Tucson Az

Postby P.T. on Mon May 12, 2008 11:37 am

I have heard repeatedly that the SM 57 doesn't sound all that great without a very good preamp. It doesn't seem to be just the gain.

I am wondering if the SM7b is like that also.
User avatar
P.T.
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:08 am

Postby ecc83 on Mon May 12, 2008 11:52 am

I don't wish to argue because I am not in any way able to have an opinion but why is it then that every picture and tv clip you see of a vocalist in a studio they have a capacitor mic 300mm from their gob?

I also think caps' are more popular this side of the pond.

Dave.
User avatar
ecc83
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:15 am
Location: northampton uk

Postby jandrodavalos on Mon May 12, 2008 2:40 pm

P.T. wrote:I have heard repeatedly that the SM 57 doesn't sound all that great without a very good preamp. It doesn't seem to be just the gain.

I am wondering if the SM7b is like that also.


if a sm57 is going through cheapo poo pre than no it is not going to sound the greatest, but if you mean a 57 is only going to sound great through a 2000 up pre than that is wrong...example sm7b/rnp combo...
a new, fancy shmancy mic will just sound *slightly* better through the same old poo-pre.
GEARLIST
http://studio-central.com/phpbb/viewtop ... 840#393840
User avatar
jandrodavalos
Member
Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:56 pm
Location: Tucson Az

Postby ecc83 on Mon May 12, 2008 2:56 pm

Just checked,

The SM7B is 4.5 dB WORSE than the '57.

Sorry, the pre spec' just got tighter!

Dave.
User avatar
ecc83
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:15 am
Location: northampton uk

Postby MASSIVE Mastering on Mon May 12, 2008 3:29 pm

No doubt, most dynamics require more gain. But it's pretty rare that a preamp doesn't have enough gain to comfortably drive one... It certainly happens though, that a dynamic will reveal the deficiencies of a preamp more readily than with a condenser...
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC
Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.), IL - USA


New freakishly inexpensive rate options -- My BLOG -- GEAR -- PHOTOS --

Image Image
User avatar
MASSIVE Mastering
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago area, IL, USA

Postby Farview on Mon May 12, 2008 5:48 pm

ecc83 wrote:I don't wish to argue because I am not in any way able to have an opinion but why is it then that every picture and tv clip you see of a vocalist in a studio they have a capacitor mic 300mm from their gob?

I also think caps' are more popular this side of the pond.

Dave.
Which vocalists? Celine Dion will be using a condenser. Screamy male rock vocalists are more likely to use an sm7.

Anyway, it looks more "pro". Most of the things you see of TV are posed.


Unrealted to my last thought, Michael Jackson used an SM7 on thriller.
User avatar
Farview
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4975
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:03 am
Location: Chicagoish

Postby MASSIVE Mastering on Mon May 12, 2008 11:00 pm

And Bono used a 58 on Joshua Tree.

Two of the biggest selling albums of all time --

Frampton used a 58 on "Comes Alive" -- The biggest selling live album of all time.

I'm not a fan of MJ, nor Bono, Nor Frampton's voice -- But you can't argue with the world-class sound of any of them.
John Scrip - Massive Mastering, LLC
Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.), IL - USA


New freakishly inexpensive rate options -- My BLOG -- GEAR -- PHOTOS --

Image Image
User avatar
MASSIVE Mastering
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago area, IL, USA


Return to Miscellaneous Questions on Mics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests