Guitar | Bass | Keyboard | Microphones | Mixers | Audio Interfaces | Sequencers & Software Plugins | Live Sound & PA | Drums | Club & DJ | Accessories | Blowouts

Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Preamps are one of the MOST important links in the audio chain. The better ones are unavoidably expensive. So before you plunge, learn about what is out there so you can make the Right choice for your studio and your budget.

Moderator: Tweak

Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Postby admin on Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:50 pm

Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Image

Price and Where to buy

Can be found here:

http://audio-pro-central.com/reviews/re ... mr_rnp.htm

Excerpt:
Who should get an RNP? Its almost harder to point out who should not get an RNP. Those who are using mixer and audio interface preamps, or the common preamps built in to a multi-track recorder stand to benefit the most from getting an RNP. The RNP also makes a nice second preamp for rigs that already may have a premium one channel preamp. Because the RNP is two channel, it it well suited for recording in stereo with matched pairs of mics. For a professional, whether to get an RNP or not may depend on if you intend to get something better to fit this need. But even so, the RNP is like to still get some use. The more "colors" the better.
Visit TweakHeadz Lab! and Audio-Pro-Central! Check out Tweak's Amazon based Audio Pro Shop

Peace always and keep it "G" (green)
admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 1:34 am
Location: USA

Postby Jordzen on Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:11 am

i love my RNP!

i only wish the volume knobs werent restricted to 12 preset steps. Simply coz it makes it hard to adjust volume subtly during recording! but i love the sound i get from it.
User avatar
Jordzen
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Earth... just visiting

Postby nanashiwanderer on Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:30 am

I've been waiting for this review since may, Tweak I noticed the tone of your review style is a bit different, it seems to be geared towards a wider audience, Is that intentional? Can we expect this of audio-pro central reviews as opposed too tweakheadz reviews?
nanashiwanderer
 

Postby Tweak on Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:18 am

Thanks for the feedback. Ah, I generally write out of whatever mood I am in. sometimes a little wild and crazy, sometimes not. I am kind of trying to reach people that have experience, not so newbie oriented as i am in the guide.
User avatar
Tweak
Resident TweakHead
Resident TweakHead
 
Posts: 29160
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 2:08 am
Location: USA

Postby Nosound on Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:25 am

So according to most folks that record either at home or pro studio this is the best 2 channel micpre for the price is there any other micpre's in this price range? I heard good things about Rane MB1 and Groove Tubes Brick micpre's :? I know Rane makes a dual version of their MB1 pre and I do know GT Brick only has one pre but heard great things about both pre's. 8) I read reviews by some recording guys named Fletcher and Harvey Gerst both guys recommended the FMR RNP and Fletcher also recommend the Groove Tubes Brick and Harvey recommended the Rane MB1 and also th FMR RNP. So based of these guys recommendation I just purchased a FMR RNP today on line but. What about the other pre's these guys mentioned? How would they compare with the FMR RNP the GT Brick cost right around 400$ (street) the daul version of the Rane MB1 still waiting on info. of the exact model of the daul version of MB1. Main reason I want more pre's I need to record drums I figured kick and snare on FMR with 57 and beta 52 OH's on the Rane daul w sm81's and another LCD S.P.B1 as a room mic on the GTbrick what do you guys think I'm usually just a lurker but still new to the recording end BTW if it matters all the mic pre's will feed into a Alesis HD24XR then mixed ITB with CEP2.1. I'm treating my room with DIY 703 for broadband absorption recommended by another guy named Etan Wiener. He said gotta do room panel first also I'll be using a pair of Alesis monitor one highly recommended by Harvey Gerst for budget monitors. So what's your opinion on the Rane MB1 and Groove Tubes Brick good as the infamous FMR RNP how well will they stack up together with my 24 alesis hdxr thanks for any input and opinions good or bad.
User avatar
Nosound
Member
Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 2:29 am

Postby thrice_removed on Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:31 am

Scroll down the page a little - I just had a thread on a topic very similar to this.
User avatar
thrice_removed
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 2:07 am

Postby doybins on Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:39 pm

peace!the reviews are crazy!!!(in a good way)whoa!this is a great preamp...how i wish i get one...too much GASsssssss(gear acquistion syndrome) going on, with too way little Cash to shell out!huhuhu
ROCK WITH GOD
ROMANS 1:16
User avatar
doybins
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:37 am

Postby Steven mc. on Sat May 26, 2007 4:19 am

I Just bought a groove tubes Brick. I like Tube on vocals and guitar amps. I am curious to hear what someone educated with Both preamps has to say though.
My Studio http://www.studio-central.com/phpbb/vie ... hp?t=42206
Home studio owner/Drummer
Punk/Metal/Remixing
User avatar
Steven mc.
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 4:30 am
Location: Tateyama-Chiba-Japan

Postby Weasel9992 on Sat May 26, 2007 6:18 am

I don't own a Brick but I have easy access to one...I do own the RNP.

I really like them both, but I generally use the Brick for DI applications. I'm not in love with the sound on vocals, but I'm not using the mics you're using in the room you're using them in. I like the RNP much better for vocals, but not as much for bass or guitar DI. That'd be a tough choice between the two. They're very different...kind of an apples/oranges comparison.

Weez
Frank Oesterheld - GIK Acoustics
http://www.GIKAcoustics.com
1-888-986-2789 (US)
(+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK)
Check out the brand new GIK QRD!
User avatar
Weasel9992
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 5350
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Savannah, GA

Postby Steven mc. on Tue May 29, 2007 1:51 am

the research I've done says they both are Good, But they are different. Tube vs SS...simple. I wanted tube, for a few reasons. I record with POD XT live a lot. I leave the cheap gain way down on the XT, and run it through the brick at max for "real" tube response and good amplification. (POD users, do some research on this) I always liked the sound of my art tube MP over Mackie SS sound, so...I figure I like tube. also with my bright rodeNT2 tube compliments it nicely. again, I'm going to wait a little while before I make my mind up with the brick.
My Studio http://www.studio-central.com/phpbb/vie ... hp?t=42206
Home studio owner/Drummer
Punk/Metal/Remixing
User avatar
Steven mc.
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
 
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 4:30 am
Location: Tateyama-Chiba-Japan

Postby thehobbster on Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:59 pm

I read that the RNP has coarse gain steps of 6db per step. Is this also the case with the threshold and ratio knobs as well, or do they have more fine movements and can tune into more other ratios that are not printed on the box?
User avatar
thehobbster
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:48 pm

Postby e-ray on Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:08 pm

The RNP has no ratio or threshold controls, only gain. And yes, they are 6dB per step.
e-ray
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Dayton, OH

Postby thehobbster on Sat Jun 23, 2007 8:58 pm

e-ray wrote:The RNP has no ratio or threshold controls, only gain. And yes, they are 6dB per step.


HAHAHA! Sorry guys. I was actually thinking of the RNC. Are they course steps as well?
User avatar
thehobbster
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:48 pm

Postby Snowbound on Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:05 pm

The RNC has smoothly operating pots like your typical hardware compressor.
User avatar
Snowbound
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Postby fry8 on Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:57 pm

Hi, I am brand new to the whole recording thing. I want to record guitars and I am thinking about getting the shure sm57 as well as this pre amp. I am going to probably be recording it on my laptop using sony acid pro. Would this be a fairly good setup? O and also, how would I connect everything to the pre amp and such? What is the difference between channel A and Channel B? Thanks.
User avatar
fry8
Member
Member
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:54 pm

Postby motulover on Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:37 am

Channel A and Channel B are two independent mono channels...perfect for stereo miking and such. Each have their own discrete outputs and gain/trim controls.
\MOTU 828mkII . Mac G5 Dual 1.8 Ghz . 4 gb . 500gb . Event TR8 . Rode NT2-A . AT3035 . Roland Juno-D/
\RME HDSP 9652 . P4 3.4ghz . 4gb . 320gb
DAW: Logic Pro 8, Reason 4.0, Melodyne
User avatar
motulover
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby thursday on Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:12 am

you can't go wrong or get more bang for your buck than the RNP-
Shure sm57 combo. Good on guitar amps and vocals, with the caveat
that it won't give you that airy top end sound . Its more of a muscular
sound. And the RNP has herds of gain.
i'm sure i'd feel much worse if i weren't under such heavy sedation
User avatar
thursday
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: AC NJ

Postby bilco on Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:31 pm

thursday wrote:you can't go wrong or get more bang for your buck than the RNP-
Shure sm57 combo. Good on guitar amps and vocals, with the caveat
that it won't give you that airy top end sound . Its more of a muscular
sound. And the RNP has herds of gain.


+1

The SM57 through the RNP on my voice is the best combination I have heard so far, other than my voice into a Lawson LDC into a Great River. Given that this IS basically a passionate hobby, I think I will stick with the SM57 and the RNP.

bilco
User avatar
bilco
Member
Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 10:04 pm

Postby thursday on Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:34 pm

Since i got my Fathead ribbon mike I've been digging that on guitar
amps :D
i'm sure i'd feel much worse if i weren't under such heavy sedation
User avatar
thursday
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: AC NJ

Postby PSlim2112 on Fri May 02, 2008 10:57 pm

I have a couple and can't say I can complain. Good sound, good buy, no worries.
Hits R US
User avatar
PSlim2112
Member
Member
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:40 pm

Re: Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Postby telecasterguru on Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:51 am

Picked up my RNP today and had to try it out straight away and used it to record my Guild D25 through a Rode NT1000.

I was blown away by the clarity and the amount of gain available.

I think it is outstanding value for the money.
User avatar
telecasterguru
Member
Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:25 am

Re: Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Postby SteveV on Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:11 pm

How would one go about setting up a monitoring configuration when using this pre? Presently, I am using the pre's on my board and recording via the direct outs on each channel. When it comes time for the overdubs, I send a monitor mix into the board then track from there. I can add comfort effects if needed. Without an monitor send within the RNP how can I get a latency free sound? A lot of other preamps I looked at have this option.
FYI...I am using a Motu 2408 as the interface.
User avatar
SteveV
Member
Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: London Ontario Canada North America Earth

Re: Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Postby Tweak on Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:50 am

You would monitor in Cue mix on the 2408. The reverb would have to be connected to a hardware send on the 2408 and return on some other inputs.
User avatar
Tweak
Resident TweakHead
Resident TweakHead
 
Posts: 29160
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 2:08 am
Location: USA

Re: Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Postby SteveV on Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:19 pm

You're right on cue with the cue mix...trouble is, I can't seem to get anything going through it, there is obviously something I am not doing, maybe someone here can walk me through the configuration.
I don't have a hardware send on the 2408 mk2, at least I don't believe so...if the cue mix is working then sending a mix back into the board from the analogue outs of the 2408 I think would do it...correct?
User avatar
SteveV
Member
Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: London Ontario Canada North America Earth

Re: Review of the FMR Really Nice Preamp

Postby Tweak on Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:38 am

It should. I use the 828mk2 cue mix. Yours may vary. I can have as many mixes as there are outputs. Naturally, if you also use these outputs in your sequencer you'll be doing it wrong. So turn OFF your sequencer's monitoring switches and only use cue mix.
User avatar
Tweak
Resident TweakHead
Resident TweakHead
 
Posts: 29160
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 2:08 am
Location: USA

Next

Return to Microphone PREAMPS

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest